- by Blog Post
- 0
- Posted on
Section 148: An Underappreciated Tool In The Cpc
One of the lesser-known yet impactful provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as “The Code”) is Section 148. This section grants courts discretionary authority to extend the time limit, not exceeding 30 days in total, for performing any act required under the Code (excluding acts governed by other laws, such as the Limitation Act, 1963). Importantly, this extension can be granted even after the original period specified or prescribed under the Code has lapsed.
The scope of Section 148 was streamlined following the 1999 Amendment to the Code, which capped the permissible extension to a maximum of 30 days to minimize procedural delays by litigating parties.
Practical Application
For instance, if a court orders a party to pay costs within a fixed period and the party fails to comply within that timeframe, an application under Section 148 may be made to seek an extension. The court, upon finding sufficient cause, may allow an extension of up to 30 days in total. However, this provision is not intended to serve as a tool for unwarranted delays or to frustrate the proceedings.
Beyond the 30-Day Limit
In exceptional cases, where delays exceed the 30-day limit, relief may be sought by invoking Section 148 in conjunction with Section 151 of the Code, provided that the delay was caused by factors beyond the party’s control or that denying the extension would lead to a miscarriage of justice.
Key Case Law
- Nashik Municipal Corporation vs. M/S. R.M. Bhandari & Anr. [AIR 2016 SC 1090]
- Salem Advocate Bar Association, Tamil Nadu vs. Union of India [AIR 2005 SC 3353]
- Gowri Ammal vs. Murugan & Ors. (2006) 2 MLJ 729
By balancing judicial discretion and procedural efficiency, Section 148 stands as a vital yet underappreciated provision in the Code, aimed at ensuring fairness and justice without compromising on timely resolution.